http://marylaine.com/exlibris/xlib287.html

Ex Libris: an E-Zine for Librarians sponsored by my bulk
mail provider,

WillCo

#287, September 15, 2006



SUBJECT INDEX to Past Issues

http://marylaine.com/
exlibris/archive.html

* * *

Neat New Stuff I Found This Week

* * *

My resume

http://marylaine.com/
resume.html
Or why you might want to hire me for speaking engagements or workshops. To see outlines for previous presentations I've done, click on Handouts

* * *

My Writings

http://marylaine.com/
resume2.html
A bibliography of my published articles and columns, with links to those available online.

* * *

Order My Books

Net Effects: How Librarians Can Manage the Unintended Consequences of the Internet, and The Quintessential Searcher: the Wit and Wisdom of Barbara Quint.

* * *

What IS Ex Libris?

http://marylaine.com/
exlibris/purpose.html

The purpose and intended scope of this e-zine

* * *

E-Mail Subscription?

For a combined subscription to Neat New Stuff and ExLibris, please click HERE, complete the form, and click on "subscribe." To unsubscribe, use the same form but click on "unsubscribe." To change addresses for an existing subscription, unsubscribe from that form and return to the page to enter the new address.

* * *

Highlights from Previous Issues:


My Rules of Information

  1. Go where it is
  2. Corollary: Who Cares?
  3. The answer depends on the question
  4. Research is a multi-stage process
  5. Ask a Librarian
  6. Information is meaningless until queried by human intelligence
  7. Information can be true and still wrong
  8. Pay attention to the jokes

* * *

Guru Interviews

  1. Tara Calishain
  2. Jenny Levine, part I
  3. Jenny Levine, Part II
  4. Reva Basch
  5. Sue Feldman
  6. Jessamyn West
  7. Debbie Abilock
  8. Kathy Schrock
  9. Greg Notess
  10. William Hann
  11. Chris Sherman
  12. Gary Price
  13. Barbara Quint
  14. Rory Litwin
  15. John Guscott
  16. Brian Smith
  17. Darlene Fichter
  18. Brenda Bailey-Hainer
  19. Walt Crawford
  20. Molly Williams
  21. Genie Tyburski
  22. Patrice McDermott
  23. Carrie Bickner
  24. Karen G. Schneider
  25. Roddy MacLeod, Part I
  26. Roddy MacLeod, Part II
  27. John Hubbard
  28. Micki McIntyre
  29. Péter Jacsó
  30. the "It's All Good" bloggers
  31. the "It's All Good" bloggers, part 2

* * *

Cool Quotes

The collected quotes from all previous issues are at http://marylaine.com/
exlibris/cool.html

* * *

When and How To Search the Net

* * *

Wanna See Your Name in Lights?

Or at least on this page, anyway? I'd like to print here your contributions as well as mine. As you've noticed, articles are brief, somewhere between 750 and 1000 words -- something to jog people's minds and get their own good ideas flowing. I'd also be happy to run other people's contributions to the regular features like Favorite Sites on _____. I'll pay you the same rate I pay me: nothing.

* * *

Drop me a Line

Want to comment, ask questions, submit articles, or invite me to speak or do some training? Write me at: marylaine at netexpress.net




Visit My Other Sites


BookBytes

http://marylaine.com/
bookbyte/index.html
My page on all things book-related.

* * *

How To Find Out of Print Books

http://marylaine.com/
bookbyte/getbooks.html
Suggested strategies, resources, and finding tools.

* * *

Best Information on the Net

http://library.sau.edu/
bestinfo/default.htmThe directory I built for O'Keefe Library, St. Ambrose University, still my favorite pit stop on the information highway.

* * *

My Word's Worth

http://marylaine.com/
myword/index.html
an occasional column on books, words, libraries, American culture, and whatever happens to interest me.

* * *

Book Proposal

Land of Why Not: an Appreciation of America. Proposal for an anthology of some of my best writing. An outline and sample columns are available here.

* * *

My personal page

http://marylaine.com/
personal.html



USER-INTELLIGIBLE

by Marylaine Block

I got a good lesson on how NOT to think like your users when I went to my fitness center this morning. A sign on the door gave a full paragraph of instructions about where we shouldn't park next Monday because of repaving. The areas not to park in were described solely with words, and ambiguous words at that. It said the southeast lot would be closed, but after I did a mental compass check to figure out which direction was southeast, I realized that there are TWO or even THREE lots that could be described as "southeast lot" (one of the two is subdivided into two lots by a strip of greenery). So I have no idea which one I'm not supposed to park in. And we're not supposed to use the entrance off of Kimberly. Since there are two entrances off Kimberly, this was not helpful either.

When I suggested to the fitness center attendant that a map would be desirable, she didn't understand the problem. She explained which areas would be closed and which would not -- it was really simple, she said, because it was the original old lots that would be repaved -- I said, yes, that's fine, but NONE OF WHAT YOU JUST SAID is on the sign. The sign makes perfect sense to you, not because of what it says, but because you are mentally filling in the blanks in what it does not say.

It's the same sort of problem users of the Seattle Public Library have been having in trying to find restrooms, copy machines, and even the way out. People have been so confused that librarians hired a professional "wayfinder" " to show them how to improve their directional signs.

It's also the same sort of problem many users have trying to follow written instructions on how to use the internet and library databases.

And it's the same sort of problem ordinary people have when they ask a techie about a computer problem. The techie says, "Oh, that's simple. You just do this..." He goes doink doink doink and suddenly the machine works. Which is fine, except you have no idea what doinks he did, in what order, why they were in that order, and what would happen if you didn't do them in the same order, or, even worse, did the wrong doinks altogether.

I think of all the people who create these unhelpful signs and instructions as doink-doink-doinkers. Their disease is that they know too much about the building/machine/process, and therefore cannot think about them as their users will.

One cure, it seems to me, is enlisting users early on in the design process. You could, for instance, put up dummy signs and building maps before you order the professional ones. Test them by bringing in some users for a private showing and asking them to find the children's room, the new books display, the information desk, the restrooms, a public meeting room. Observe where their eyes go as they're looking for signs and maps and other clues. Are those the places where you've posted signs?

And once they've found your signs, ask them to tell you in their own words what the signs say. Once they've found your maps, ask them to show you where they are on the map and the route they'll use to get from there to the restroom. Watch them to see if they get there. Then you can use what you learn to redesign your signs and maps, and their placement.

Alternatively, you could do what librarians at the Carnegie Library of Pittsburgh did after they remodeled the first floor of their building: watch users as they navigate through new or remodeled buildings to see the places at which they stop, stare, and try to figure out what to do next. At each of those confusion points, librarians posted either signs or staff.

You might also consider what is the simplest, most economical way to explain something to your users. Often, it includes good graphics. In the case of my fitness center's parking lot, a one sentence message with a map showing the affected parking areas would have been instantly understood. As it was, people had to put in a lot of mental work (let's see, southeast would be here, and they must mean this entrance...) just to realize that they still didn't understand the message.

In an academic library, where librarians teach information literacy, it would make sense to show students how to use the databases and then ask them to write instructions for other students. Why? Because they won't mentally fill in the blanks like we do. They know from experience the ways in which the search interface doesn't make sense, and they will tackle those problems head on.

One of the presentations I have delivered frequently is on how to train seniors in using the internet. I'm good at it because, since I was over 50 when our library first got Netscape, I KNOW where, why, and how they are confused. I know they don't pay any attention to the browser functions, don't understand the distinction between the browser itself and the web content. I know that the first experience of the net is getting sort of seasick as you click from one site to another and have no idea what you're doing, where you are, or how to get back to where you were. I answer those questions up front in my teaching and in my handouts. I go slowly, and I tell them exactly which keys I'm pushing, and why.

And since I'm their generation, I also understand the trusting world view they were brought up with that makes them such ripe and juicy targets for con artists, so I show them how to figure out how to evaluate both the information and the information provider. I also show them a few things they should never ever do, like download attachments from strangers.

That brings me to another way of figuring out how to think like your users: ask them what they wish they had known when they first used your building/computers/internet/databases. Then figure that input into your future signage, maps, and instructions.

And you might spend some time analyzing the dumb questions you get. If people keep asking you where the copy machine is when they're standing right by a sign for the copiers, you just might have a problem with either the wording or placement of that sign.

I notice library signs and instructions a lot more now than I used to, and the reason is this: I'm not a practicing librarian anymore. I'm a library user. And you know what? Like any other library user, I want you to think like me. I want a library that is so intuitive and well-signed that I don't HAVE to ask questions.

* * * * *

COOL QUOTE:

The user is not broken. Your system is broken until proven otherwise... The most significant help you can provide your users is to add value and meaning to the information experience, wherever it happens; defend their right to read; and then get out of the way... Information flows down the path of least resistance. If you block a tool the users want, users will go elsewhere to find it. You cannot change the user, but you can transform the user experience to meet the user. Meet people where they are--not where you want them to be.

Karen G. Schneider. "The User Is Not Broken." Free Range Librarian, June 3, 2006 http://freerangelibrarian.com/2006/06/the_user_is_not_broken_a_meme.php

* * *

You are welcome to copy and forward any of my own articles (but not those by my guest writers) for noncommercial purposes as long as you credit ExLibris and cite the permanent URL for the article. Please do NOT copy and post my articles to your own web sites, however. Instead, please copy a brief excerpt and link to the URL for the remainder of the article.

Ex Libris: an E-Zine for Librarians and Other Information Junkies.
http://marylaine.com/exlibris/
Copyright, Marylaine Block, 1999-2006.

[Publishers may license the content for a reasonable fee.]